Subject matter, scope and definitions
On this provision: 1 EBA Q&A
Subject matter
These guidelines specify sound risk management practices for credit institutions for managing non-performing exposures (NPEs), forborne exposures (FBEs) and foreclosed assets.
These guidelines also provide competent authorities with guidance on assessing credit institutions’ risk management practices, policies, processes and procedures for managing NPEs and FBEs as part of the supervisory review and evaluation process (SREP).
Scope of application
These guidelines apply in relation to Article 74 of Directive 2013/36/EU,(8) which requires institutions to have robust governance arrangements, including a clear organisational structure with well-defined, transparent and consistent lines of responsibility, effective processes to identify, manage, monitor and report the risks they are or might be exposed to and adequate control mechanisms.
Competent authorities should ensure that credit institutions comply with these guidelines on an individual, sub-consolidated and consolidated basis in accordance with Article 109 of Directive 2013/36/EU.
All sections of these guidelines apply to all exposures subject to definitions of non-performing and forbearance as defined in Annex V (opens EUR-Lex in a new tab) to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 (opens EUR-Lex in a new tab).(9)
For the purposes of the abovementioned definitions of non-performing and forborne exposures in Annex V (opens EUR-Lex in a new tab) to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 (opens EUR-Lex in a new tab), trading exposures include the exposures in the trading book defined in point 86 of Article 4(1) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013.
Credit institutions with a gross NPL ratio equal to or greater than 5% on consolidated, sub-consolidated or solo level should apply sections 4 and 5 of these guidelines to the entities that have NPL ratios exceeding the set threshold.
Where credit institutions have a gross NPL ratio below the 5% level but have a high share or material amount of NPEs in an individual portfolio or individual portfolios with a specific concentration of NPEs in a geographical region, an economic sector or a group of connected clients, competent authorities may require credit institutions to apply sections 4 and 5 at the level of these portfolios.
Furthermore, competent authorities may identify credit institutions other than those covered in paragraph 11 that should also apply sections 4 and 5. Competent authorities should require the application of these sections if they identify signs of deteriorating asset quality. Competent authorities should consider the following elements and their interactions when assessing the applicability of sections 4 and 5:
a) increased inflows of NPEs;
b) a high or increased level of FBEs;
c) a high or increased level of foreclosed assets;
d) low coverage ratios;
e) breached early warning indicators;
f) an elevated Texas ratio;
g) the quality and appropriateness of workout activity.
All credit institutions should apply sections 6 to 9.
Credit institutions should comply with these guidelines in a manner that is appropriate to their size and internal organisation and the nature, scope and complexity of their activities; in particular, credit institutions may comply with sections 4 and 5 taking into account the proportionality criteria specified in section 4, Title I, of the EBA Guidelines on internal governance.(10) Furthermore, if the credit institution is classified by the competent authorities for SREP purposes as SREP Category 3 or 4 (as assigned in accordance with the EBA Guidelines on common procedures and methodologies for the SREP(11)), then the guidelines should be applied in a proportionate manner. The principle of proportionality in the application of these guidelines will relate in particular to simplified obligations for the operationalisation and governance arrangements supporting the NPE strategies of credit institutions (section 5).
Proportionality in terms of the supervisory assessment of the NPE strategy of a SREP Category 3 or 4 institution can be achieved by aligning the assessment with the SREP engagement model, which ensures a risk-based approach to supervision and takes into account the systemic importance of the institution.
Addressees
These guidelines are addressed to competent authorities as defined in point (i) of Article 4(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010. The guidelines are also addressed to credit institutions as defined in point 1 of Article 4(1) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013.
Definitions
Unless otherwise specified, terms used and defined in Directive 2013/36/EU, Regulation (EU) No 575/2013,(12) and Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 (opens EUR-Lex in a new tab), as amended and in force, have the same meaning in the guidelines.
In addition and in particular, for the purposes of these guidelines, the following definitions apply.
Cure period | As defined in Part 2, paragraph 231(b), of Annex V (opens EUR-Lex in a new tab) to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 (opens EUR-Lex in a new tab) |
EBITDA | Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortisation |
Forbearance | Forbearance measures as referred in Annex V (opens EUR-Lex in a new tab) to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 (opens EUR-Lex in a new tab) |
Forborne exposures (FBEs) | Exposures in respect to which forbearance measures have been applied in accordance with Annex V (opens EUR-Lex in a new tab) to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 (opens EUR-Lex in a new tab) |
Foreclosed assets | Assets obtained by taking possession of collateral and which remain recognised on the balance sheet. Foreclosed assets can be obtained through judicial procedures, through bilateral agreement with the borrower or through other types of collateral transfer from the borrower to the credit institution. Foreclosed assets may include financial and non-financial assets and should include all collateral obtained irrespective of accounting classification |
Immovable property | Immovable property as defined in Article 208 of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 |
Liquidation cost | Liquidation costs are defined as the cash outflows incurred during collateral execution and the sales process and include: a) all applicable legal costs; b) selling costs, taxes and other expenses; c) any additional maintenance costs to be incurred by the credit institution in relation to the repossession and disposal of the collateral; d) any cash inflows up to the date of liquidation |
Management body | As defined in points 7 and 8 of Article 3(1) of Directive 2013/36/EU |
Movable property | Physical property other than immovable property in accordance with Article 210 of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 |
Non-performing exposures (NPEs) | Exposures classified as non-performing in accordance with Annex V (opens EUR-Lex in a new tab) to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 (opens EUR-Lex in a new tab) |
Non-performing loans (NPLs) | Loans and advances as defined in Annex V (opens EUR-Lex in a new tab) to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 (opens EUR-Lex in a new tab) that are classified as non-performing in accordance with Annex V (opens EUR-Lex in a new tab) to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 (opens EUR-Lex in a new tab) |
NPL ratio | To calculate the NPL ratio, the gross carrying amount of NPLs and advances is divided by the gross carrying amount of total loans and advances in accordance with the NPE definition |
NPE framework | Policies, processes, controls and systems for risk management of NPEs |
Portfolio | A group of exposures with similar credit risk characteristics |
Probation period | As defined in Annex V (opens EUR-Lex in a new tab) to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 (opens EUR-Lex in a new tab) |
Risk appetite framework (RAF) | The overall approach, including policies, processes, controls and systems, through which risk appetite is established, communicated and monitored. It includes a risk appetite statement, risk limits and an outline of the roles and responsibilities of those overseeing the implementation and monitoring of the RAF. The RAF should consider material risks to the credit institution, as well as to its reputation with depositors, investors and customers. The RAF aligns with the bank’s strategy |
Texas ratio | Texas ratio: a ratio comparing the stock of NPLs with a credit institution’s equity. NPLs (gross carrying amount) over equity and accumulated impairments |